Moral Relativism, Metalinguistic Negotiation, and the Epistemic Significance of Disagreement
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Although moral relativists often appeal to cases of apparent disagreement between members different communities motivate their view, accounting for these exchanges as evincing genuine disagreements constitutes a challenge the coherence relativism. While many acknowledge this problem, attempts solve it so far have been wanting. In response, either give up claim that there can be or end with view on which no “epistemic significance” because they are always faultless. This paper introduces an alternative strategy: in terms “metalinguistic negotiation”. It argues strategy better solution poses leads nuanced understanding epistemic significance communities. The upshot is novel account has consequences how relativism should understood.
منابع مشابه
Epistemic Relativism and Reasonable Disagreement [version of June, 2007]
I begin with some familiar conceptions of epistemic relativism. One kind of epistemic relativism is descriptive pluralism. This is the simple, non-normative thesis that many different communities, cultures, social networks, etc. endorse different epistemic systems (E-systems), i.e., different sets of norms, standards, or principles for forming beliefs and other doxastic states. Communities try ...
متن کاملRelativism and Disagreement
It has often been proposed that claims about what is funny, delicious, or likely are “subjective,” in the sense that their truth depends not only on how things are with the objects they explicitly concern, but on how things are with some subject not explicitly mentioned. This thought is supported by the striking degree to which we differ in our judgements about these matters. If there are wholl...
متن کاملEpistemic Relativism
Epistemic relativism rejects the idea that claims can be assessed from a universally applicable, objective standpoint. It is greatly disdained because it suggests that the real ‘basis’ for our views is something fleeting, such as ‘‘the techniques of mass persuasion’’ (Thomas Kuhn 1970) or the determination of intellectuals to achieve ‘‘solidarity’’ (Rorty 1984) or ‘‘keep the conversation going’...
متن کاملMoral Contextualism and Moral Relativism
Moral relativism provides a compelling explanation of linguistic data involving ordinary moral expressions like ‘right’ and ‘wrong’. But it is a very radical view. Because relativism relativizes sentence truth to contexts of assessment it forces us to revise standard linguistic theory. If, however, no competing theory explains all of the evidence, perhaps it is time for a paradigm shift. Howeve...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Erkenntnis
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['0165-0106', '1572-8420']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00418-5